Influence of Class Action Learning Model on The Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior of Higher-Class Students of State Elementary School 01 Cilandak Timur, South Jakarta

Pudentiana Rr. R. E.; Siti Nurbayani  Tauchid

doi:10.54783/influencejournal.v4i2.43

Authors

Pudentiana Rr. R. E. Jakarta Ministry of Health Polytechnic I, Indonesia
Siti Nurbayani Tauchid Jakarta Ministry of Health Polytechnic I, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54783/influencejournal.v4i2.43

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the classroom action learning model on dental health on the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of upper-class students at Primary School 01 Cilandak Timur, South Jakarta. This study aims to increase students’ knowledge criteria by applying an action learning model for class V Elementary School in Cilandak State Elementary School. The subjects of this study were 32 class V students as the intervention class and class V Elementary School Borobudur as the control class. The method used was Classroom Action Research. This study used a pre and post-test design with a control group. The pre-test and post-test control group designs involve two classes: the experimental and control classes. Before being given treatment, both classes did a pre-test to get the initial cognitive abilities of the fifth graders. Then the two classes were offered the treatment to the experimental class, namely learning by applying good and correct brushing techniques, while the control class was not given any treatment. After learning, a post-test was conducted to determine the cognitive abilities of the experimental class and control class respondents. In this study, the sample used is part of the population, which is 10%. The sample calculation is 0,1 X 300, that is, 30 people in the intervention class and 30 in the control class with different schools. The results of the study can be concluded that the Classroom Action Learning Model in terms of the teacher’s ability to manage the class is said to be effective because the total percentage of good and very good assessments is more than the percentage of poor and quite good assessments, namely: 92% > 8%, Classroom Action Learning Model is reviewed of student activities in learning is said to be effective because the number of percentages of good and very good assessments is more than the number of percentages of poor and good enough assessments, namely: 75% > 25%, Class Action Learning Model in terms of student responses to learning is said to be effective because the number of assessment percentages good and very good more than the total percentage of assessments are not good and quite good, namely: 85% > 15%, Class Action Learning Model in terms of student learning outcomes after learning is said to be effective because the total percentage of assessments understands and understands more than the total percentage appraiser Ian understands well and quite understands, namely: 85% > 15%.

References

Baelum, V., van Palenstein Helderman, W., Hugoson, A., Yee, R., & Fejerskov, O. (2007). A global perspective on changes in the burden of caries and periodontitis: implications for dentistry. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 34(12), 872-906.

Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., & Kok, G. (1998). Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory and evidence-based health education programs. Health education & behavior, 25(5), 545-563.

Chan, Y., Irish, J. C., Wood, S. J., Rotstein, L. E., Brown, D. H., Gullane, P. J., & Lockwood, G. A. (2002). Patient education and informed consent in head and neck surgery. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 128(11), 1269-1274.

da Cunha, I. P., Pereira, A. C., Frias, A. C., Vieira, V., de Castro Meneghim, M., Batista, M. J., ... & Bulgareli, J. V. (2017). Social vulnerability and factors associated with oral impact on daily performance among adolescents. Health and quality of life outcomes, 15(1), 1-10.

Gurunathan, D., Moses, J., & Arunachalam, S. K. (2018). Knowledge, attitude, and practice of mothers regarding oral hygiene of primary school children in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 11(4), 338.

Haque, S. E., Rahman, M., Itsuko, K., Mutahara, M., Kayako, S., Tsutsumi, A., ... & Mostofa, M. (2016). Effect of a school-based oral health education in preventing untreated dental caries and increasing knowledge, attitude, and practices among adolescents in Bangladesh. BMC oral health, 16(1), 1-10.

Hornby, G., & Lafaele, R. (2011). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An explanatory model. Educational review, 63(1), 37-52.

Jatmika, S. E. D., & Maulana, M. (2018). Dental and Oral Health Education for Elementary School Students through Patient Hygiene Performance Index Indicator. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 7(4), 259-263.

Josselson, R. L. (1973). Psychodynamic aspects of identity formation in college women. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2(1), 3-52.

Laila, N., Tulloh, R. R., & Iswati, N. (2018). Quartet Card Games to Improve Knowledge, Behavior and Attitude of Children About Dental and Oral Health. Jurnal Keperawatan Soedirman, 13(1), 44-49.

Mahmudiono, T., Nindyasari, A., Segalita, C., Nasikhah, A. D., & Peng, L. S. (2020). Nutrition Education on Food Hygiene and Sanitation to increase Knowledge, Attitude and Practice among Canteen Food Handler in Indonesia. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(11), 1396-1400.

Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons, 52(4), 357-365.

Mustika, I. W., & Sudiantara, K. (2019). Effects of health promotion with family approaches on blood pressure and headache toward elderly. International Journal of Health Sciences, 3(3), 8-16.

Nations, M. K., & Nuto, S. D. A. S. (2002). “Tooth worms”, poverty tattoos and dental care conflicts in Northeast Brazil. Social Science & Medicine, 54(2), 229-244.

Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health promotion international, 15(3), 259-267.

Peres, M. A., Macpherson, L. M., Weyant, R. J., Daly, B., Venturelli, R., Mathur, M. R., ... & Watt, R. G. (2019). Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. The Lancet, 394(10194), 249-260.

Petersen, P. E., & Yamamoto, T. (2005). Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 33(2), 81-92.

Rakchanok, N., Amporn, D., Yoshida, Y., Harun-Or-Rashid, M. D., & Sakamoto, J. (2010). Dental caries and gingivitis among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Nagoya J Med Sci, 72(1-2), 43-50.

Watt, R. G. (2005). Strategies and approaches in oral disease prevention and health promotion. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83, 711-718.

Williams, D. R., & Cooper, L. A. (2019). Reducing racial inequities in health: using what we already know to take action. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(4), 606.

Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1997). Lean thinking—banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(11), 1148- 1148.