Cone Crusher Machine Maintenance Analysis Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) and Six Big Losses Method to Improve Machine Effectiveness at PT Selo Agung

Authors

  • Andhika Ramadhani Ananta Irianto Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Wastukancana, Purwakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ihsan Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Wastukancana, Purwakarta, Indonesia
  • Indra Gumelar Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Wastukancana, Purwakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54783/influencejournal.v8i2.340

Keywords:

Cone Crusher, Maintenance, Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), Preventive, Maintenance, Six Big Losses.

Abstract

PT Selo Agung is a company engaged in andesite stone mining located in Plered, Purwakarta Regency, West Java. Its cone crusher machine plays a vital role in crushing andesite stone into construction material, but its performance is frequently hindered by component failures and suboptimal maintenance activities, resulting in high downtime and disrupted production. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the cone crusher machine using the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) method, identify the factors causing the decline in production effectiveness through Six Big Losses calculation, and propose improvements to enhance machine effectiveness. Historical data from February 2025 to January 2026 were processed by calculating Availability, Performance Efficiency, and Quality Ratio, followed by Six Big Losses analysis, a fishbone diagram, and improvement proposals using the 5W+1H method. The results show that the average OEE value of the cone crusher machine was only 56.10%, far below the JIPM world-class standard of 85%, falling into the Unacceptable category. Availability at 67.86% was the largest contributor to the gap, followed by Performance Efficiency at 85.14% and Quality Ratio at 97.08%. Equipment Failure (Breakdown) Losses was identified as the most dominant loss, contributing 53.08% of total losses, mainly caused by the absence of scheduled preventive maintenance. The proposed improvements include implementing scheduled preventive maintenance with periodic replacement of the mantle and concave, developing a written maintenance SOP, operator training, and stabilizing material supply along with regular Closed Side Setting (CSS) calibration. Consistent long-term implementation (12-18 months) of these proposals is projected to raise the OEE value from 56.10% to 83.05%, approaching the world-class standard.

References

Ansori, I., & Mustajib, M. I. (2013). Sistem Perawatan Terpadu (Integrated Maintenance System). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Assauri, S. (2008). Manajemen Produksi dan Operasi. Depok: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Cwi, D. P. T. (2021). Peningkatan Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) pada Mesin Molding melalui Perbaikan Six Big Losses. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 7(4), 100–108.

Daman, A., & Nusraningrum, D. (2020). Analysis of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) on Excavator Hitachi EX2500-6. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (DIJEMSS), 1(6), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v1i6

Fahmi, I., & Supriyadi. (2022). Analisis Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) dan Six Big Losses pada Mesin Injection Moulding. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, 11(1), 45–54.

Harjono, B., & Sari, D. P. (2021). Analisis Efektivitas Mesin dengan Metode OEE dan Identifikasi Six Big Losses pada Industri Semen. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 20(2), 112–121.

Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2015). Manajemen Operasi: Manajemen Keberlangsungan dan Rantai Pasokan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Herawan, F., & Mansur, A. (2025). Evaluasi Efektivitas Mesin Produksi Menggunakan Metode Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE). Jurnal Disprotek, 16(2), 153–162.

Iskandar, A., & Fitriani, R. (2023). Pengukuran Efektivitas Mesin Crusher Batu Bara Menggunakan Metode OEE. Jurnal Teknik Mesin dan Industri, 5(1), 28–37.

Muchiri, P., & Pintelon, L. (2008). Performance Measurement Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE): Literature Review and Practical Application Discussion. International Journal of Production Research, 46(13), 3517–3535.

Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance. Productivity Press.

Nugraha, A. E. (2024). Analisis Kinerja Mesin Welding dengan Menggunakan Metode Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) pada Divisi Alat Berat. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 8(3), 576–586.

Pandiangan, S. A. E., Ginting, R., & Tarigan, U. (2020). Penerapan Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) untuk Pengukuran Efektivitas Mesin di PT. XYZ. Jurnal Teknik Industri USU, 9(2), 95–102.

Purba, H. H., Jaqin, C., Hasibuan, S., & Amrina, U. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) pada Industri Manufaktur Komponen Elektronik. Jurnal Industri Manufaktur, 2, 18–25.

Rapi, A., & Novawanda, O. (2014). Pengukuran Kinerja Mesin Defekator I (Studi Kasus pada PT Perkebunan XY). Jurnal Teknik Industri, 2(2), 5–11.

Santoso, A., & Wahyuni, N. (2021). Analisis Kerusakan Mesin Crusher pada Industri Pertambangan dengan Metode Root Cause Analysis. Jurnal Teknik Pertambangan, 7(2), 55–64.

Sugianto, R., Hidayat, T., & Prasetyo, B. (2023). Pengukuran Efektivitas Alat Berat Crusher pada Tambang Andesit Menggunakan Metode OEE. Jurnal Teknologi Mineral dan Batubara, 19(3), 143–153.

Vprk, P. T. (2024). Penerapan Metode Total Productive Maintenance dengan Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) pada Mesin Grinding. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 8(4), 888–896.

Wibisono, D. (2021). Analisis Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Mesin Bubut (Studi Kasus di Pabrik Parts PT). Jurnal Teknik Industri, 3(1), 7–13.

Wibowo, P. A., & Padilah, I. (2023). Analisis Overall Equipment Effectiveness pada Lini Produksi. G-Tech: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, 7(2), 439–449.

Published

19-07-2026

How to Cite

Irianto, A. R. A. ., Ihsan, M. ., & Gumelar, I. (2026). Cone Crusher Machine Maintenance Analysis Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) and Six Big Losses Method to Improve Machine Effectiveness at PT Selo Agung. INFLUENCE: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE REVIEW, 8(2), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.54783/influencejournal.v8i2.340