Selecting the Best Alternative for Procurement of Equipment Labeling Facilities at PT XYZ Using the DELPHI and AHP Methods

Gilang Pratama; A. A. Bgs. Dinariyana Dwi  Putranta

doi:10.54783/influencejournal.v7i2.274

Authors

Gilang Pratama 2Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
A. A. Bgs. Dinariyana Dwi Putranta Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54783/influencejournal.v7i2.274

Abstract

PT XYZ is a company that manages the Balikpapan Refinery Development Master Plan (RDMP) Project. This project aims to increase the refinery processing capacity and produce products with EURO V quality that are more environmentally friendly. Currently, the project is in the final construction phase, which will be followed by the commissioning phase, a phase that greatly requires effective equipment identification. In this project, the labels available on the equipment are not operationally adequate, and the procurement of facilities for equipment labeling is not included in the project's scope of work. There are three alternatives to solve this problem: implementing a change order in the project contract, implementing a label procurement framework contract, and procuring facilities independently by the relevant department. This study aims to choose the best procurement method among the three alternatives. Based on the questionnaire data filled out by respondents and processed using the Delphi analysis method, four criteria and twelve sub-criteria were obtained. These criteria were then processed using the AHP method to produce criteria weighting, namely cost (0.404), time (0.332), quality (0.164), and operational (0.100). Based on these criteria and sub-criteria, the best alternative for procurement of equipment labeling facilities at PT XYZ is independent facility procurement by the relevant department (0.454), followed by the implementation of label procurement framework contract (0.320), and the implementation of change orders on project contracts (0.226).

References

Amaechi, C. V., Reda, A., Kgosiemang, I. M., Ja’e, I. A., Oyetunji, A. K., Olukolajo, M. A., & Igwe, I. B. (2022). Guidelines on asset management of offshore facilities for monitoring, sustainable maintenance, and safety practices. Sensors, 22(19), 7270.

Arunyanart, S., & Khumpang, P. (2025). A decision-making framework for evaluating medical equipment suppliers under uncertainty. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 9858.

Chen, Y., Huang, D., & Wang, L. (2025). A study on the application of the latent dirichlet allocation model in production optimization. Results in Engineering, 26, 104920.

Donia, M. B., Mach, M., O’Neill, T. A., & Brutus, S. (2022). Student satisfaction with use of an online peer feedback system. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 269-283.

Emmert‐Streib, F., & Dehmer, M. (2022). Taxonomy of machine learning paradigms: A data‐centric perspective. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 12(5), e1470.

Gayialis, S. P., Kechagias, E. P., Papadopoulos, G. A., & Masouras, D. (2022). A review and classification framework of traceability approaches for identifying product supply chain counterfeiting. Sustainability, 14(11), 6666.

Heaton, R., Martin, H., Chadee, A., Milling, A., Dunne, S., & Borthwick, F. (2022). The construction materials conundrum: practical solutions to address integrated supply chain complexities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(8), 04022071.

Islam, F., Heeren, P., Yang, K., Milisen, K., & Sabbe, M. (2024). Identifying key items to be addressed by non-clinical operators to manage out-of-hours telephone triage services for older adults seeking non-urgent unplanned care in Belgium: an e-Delphi study. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 189.

Jahanvand, B., Mortazavi, S. B., Mahabadi, H. A., & Ahmadi, O. (2023). Determining essential criteria for selection of risk assessment techniques in occupational health and safety: A hybrid framework of fuzzy Delphi method. Safety science, 167, 106253.

Jradi, M., Boel, N., Madsen, B. E., Jacobsen, J., Hooge, J. S., & Kildelund, L. (2021). BuildCOM: automated auditing and continuous commissioning of next generation building management systems. Energy Informatics, 4(1), 2.

Kaur, M., & Gupta, S. (2023). The determinants of bank selection criteria of SMEs: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy approach. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(2), 329-352.

Lianto, B. (2023). Identifying key assessment factors for a company’s innovation capability based on intellectual capital: an application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method. Sustainability, 15(7), 6001.

Pannuti, L., Marsocci, A., Curti, F., Maggi, G., Petrone, B., Peretti, A., ... & Magnifica, F. (2023). Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of the Spine Functional Index. Muscles, Ligaments & Tendons Journal (MLTJ), 13(3).

Safaeian, M., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., Kabirifar, K., Yazdani, M., & Shapouri, M. (2022). Selecting appropriate risk response strategies considering utility function and budget constraints: A case study of a construction company in Iran. Buildings, 12(2), 98.

Sarwono, A. E., & Handayani, A. (2021). Metode kuantitatif. Unisri Press.

Shahriar, M. M., Parvez, M. S., Islam, M. A., & Talapatra, S. (2022). Implementation of 5S in a plastic bag manufacturing industry: A case study. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 8, 100488.

Sholeh, M., Nur, & Fauziah, Shifa. (2022). Pengadaan Material Proyek Engineering Procurement Construction. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pranala.

Singh, J., & Anumba, C. J. (2024). Building commissioning process and documentation: a literature review and directions for future research. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(1), 75-85.

Sipos, L., Nyitrai, Á., Hitka, G., Friedrich, L. F., & Kókai, Z. (2021). Sensory panel performance evaluation—Comprehensive review of practical approaches. Applied Sciences, 11(24), 11977.

Spranger, J., Homberg, A., Sonnberger, M., & Niederberger, M. (2022). Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: a methodological review. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 172, 1-11.

Weng, F., Tian, J., Fang, X., Cheng, S., Pan, Z., & Liu, Y. (2025). Research on establishment decision of medical equipment measurement standard based on GDM-AHP. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 9309.

Xu, C., Guo, L., Wang, K., Yang, T., Feng, Y., Wang, H., ... & Fu, G. (2023). Current challenges of university laboratory: Characteristics of human factors and safety management system deficiencies based on accident statistics. Journal of safety research, 86, 318-335.

Yang, Q., Chen, Z. S., Chan, C. Y., Pedrycz, W., Martínez, L., & Skibniewski, M. J. (2022). Large-scale group decision-making for prioritizing engineering characteristics in quality function deployment under comparative linguistic environment. Applied Soft Computing, 127, 109359.

Yep, B. L., Tan, T. K., & Fung, F. M. (2023). How partial anonymity may reduce students’ anxiety during remote active learning─ a case study using clubhouse. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(2), 459-468.

Zafar, M. H., Langås, E. F., & Sanfilippo, F. (2024). Exploring the synergies between collaborative robotics, digital twins, augmentation, and industry 5.0 for smart manufacturing: A state-of-the-art review. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 89, 102769.