Economic Valuation of “Parak” Traditional Agroforestry  West Sumatera (Case Study in Nagari Paninggahan, Solok  Regency)

Helmayuni; Mardianto

doi:10.54783/influencejournal.v3i3.271

Authors

Helmayuni Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin Solok, Indonesia
Mardianto Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin Solok, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54783/influencejournal.v3i3.271

Abstract

This study aims to determine the economic value, which is a direct and indirect benefit (tangible and intangible) of Parak in the research area. This research used a case study method, and the sampling was carried out in a purposive manner consisting of 50 sample farmers. The data used in this study are primary data and secondary data. Preliminary data were obtained by direct interviews with respondents based on the questionnaire provided, while secondary data were taken from agencies related to this research. The processing of data obtained in the field shows that Parak plays an important role in supporting the economy of farmers in Nagari Paninggahan either directly or indirectly. The direct use value obtained from the plant is IDR. 46,753,650 (66,316 per cent), from firewood of IDR. 23,070,000 (32,722 percent) and from livestock IDR. 678,550 (0.963 per cent) so that the total direct use income is IDR. 70,502,200 per year of all commodities cultivated by the sample farmers. Meanwhile, for indirect use, such as household/domestic water use, IDR. 13,312,320/year and agricultural irrigation water IDR. 54,052,111/year. The total indirect usage is IDR. 67,364,431,-. Per year. Agroforestry patterns can cover the soil layer well and have an effective influence on soil erosion control to increase the supply of water in the soil. Respondents have also carried out other conservation activities by constructing bench terraces, terracing systems, and other buildings to suppress sedimentation and erosion.

References

Affandi, O., Zaitunah, A., & Batubara, R. (2017). Potential economic and development prospects of non-timber forest products in community agroforestry land around Sibolangit tourism-park. Forest and Society, 68-77.

Asmin, F. (2020). Modal Sosial Kognitif dalam Pengelolaan Parak dan Rimbo di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya, 3(2), 101-122.

Asmin, F., Darusman, D., Ichwandi, I., & Suharjito, D. (2016). Local ecological knowledge on forest clearing: A case study of parak and rimbo practices in Simancuang Community, Indonesia. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 8(2), 208-220.

Asmin, F., Darusman, D., Ichwandi, I., & Suharjito, D. (2017). Elaborating the attributes of local ecological knowledge: A case study of parak and rimbo practices in Koto Malintang Village. Advanced Science Letters, 23(4), 2812-2817.

Asmin, F., Darusman, D., Ichwandi, I., & Suharjito, D. (2017). Social capital of parak and rimbo management in West Sumatra. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 23(3), 140-149.

Assyifa, O. S. (2021). Strategi Pemasaran Objek Wisata Petilasan Prabu Siliwangi Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Majalengka (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon).

Bong, I. W., Moeliono, M., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2019). What is success? Gaps and trade-offs in assessing the performance of traditional social forestry systems in Indonesia. Forest and Society.

Catacutan, D. C., & Villamor, G. B. (2016). Gender roles and land use preferences—Implications to landscape restoration in Southeast Asia. In Land Restoration (pp. 431-440). Academic Press.

Hairiah, K., & Ashari, S. (2013). Pertanian masa depan: Agroforestri, manfaat, dan layanan lingkungan. In Seminar Nasional Agroforestri (pp. 23-35).

Indrajaya, Y., & Sudomo, A. (2013). Analisis finansial agroforestry sengon dan kapulaga di Desa Payungagung, Kecamatan Panumbangan, Ciamis. Jurnal Penelitian Agroforestry, 1(2), 123-132.

Martial, T. (2012, November). The need of tree tenure security to maintenance the Traditional Agroforestry (Parak) In Koto Malintang Village, West Sumatra. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference, Syiah Kuala University-Life Sciences & Engineering Chapter (Vol. 2, No. 1).

Michon, G., Mary, F., & Bompard, J. (1986). Multistoried agroforestry garden system in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 4(4), 315-338.

Mutiani, C., & Febriamansyah, R. (2021). Agroforestry management practices in relation to tenure security in Koto Tangah Subdistrict, West Sumatra, Indonesia. In Natural Resource Governance in Asia (pp. 27-37). Elsevier.

Parmawati, R. (2019). Valuasi Ekonomi Sumberdaya Alam & Lingkungan Menuju Ekonomi Hijau. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Rahman, S. A., Sunderland, T., Roshetko, J. M., Basuki, I., & Healey, J. R. (2016). Tree culture of smallholder farmers practicing agroforestry in Gunung Salak Valley, West Java, Indonesia. Small-scale Forestry, 15(4), 433-442.

Rahu, A. A., Hidayat, K., Ariyadi, M., & Hakim, L. (2013). Ethnoecology of Kaleka: Dayak’s agroforestry in Kapuas, Central Kalimantan Indonesia. Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences.

Roshetko, J. M., Nugraha, E., Tukan, J. C. M., Manurung, G., Fay, C., & Van Noordwijk, M. (2007). Agroforestry for livelihood enhancement and enterprise development. In Aciar Proceedings (Vol. 126, P. 137). ACIAR; 1998.

Samsudin, Y. B., Puspitaloka, D., Rahman, S. A., Chandran, A., & Baral, H. (2020). Community-Based Peat Swamp Restoration through Indonesia. Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes, 349-365.

Santhyami, S., Basukriadi, A., Patria, M. P., & Abdulhadi, R. (2018). The comparison of aboveground C-stock between cacao-based agroforestry system and cacao monoculture practice in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 19(2), 472-479.

Sardjono, M. A., Djogo, T., Arifin, H. S., & Wijayanto, N. (2003). Klasifikasi dan pola kombinasi komponen agroforestri. Bahan Ajaran Agroforestri, 2.