Campus Learning Based on AI: Implementation of ChatGPT in AILS and Its Implications for Curriculum Development in Indonesia


  • Herry Trilaksana Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Soegianto Soelistiono Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Wahidin Siliwangi University, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia



The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the context of higher education has increasingly drawn attention, especially with rapid technological advancements. One intriguing implementation of AI is ChatGPT, a generative language model capable of interacting naturally with users. In this study, we explore how ChatGPT can be utilized in campus learning in Indonesia using the Artificial Intelligent Learning System (AILS) and how its usage impacts curriculum development. Through literature analysis and case studies, we investigate various ways in which ChatGPT has been applied in the campus learning environment, including student-teacher interactions, learning assistance, and curriculum content development through AILS. We also consider the positive and negative impacts of using ChatGPT in the learning process, including increased efficiency, student engagement, and challenges that may arise in integrating this technology with existing curricula. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for education decision-makers, educators, and curriculum developers regarding the potential use of ChatGPT in the context of campus learning in Indonesia through AILS. We also highlight the need for collaboration between technology and educators in designing the right strategies to optimize the benefits of AI in enhancing the quality of higher education.


Brown, P. G., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. Solution Tree Press.

Dillenbourg, P. (2013). MOOCs: Two sides of the same coin - at least. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 51-54).

Donnelly, R., & Hickey, T. (2013). Implementing a virtual learning environment in an SME: A case study of Learn Skills. Computers & Education, 60(1), 264-274.

Dörnyei, Z. (2014). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Routledge.

Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137-144.

Grosseck, G., & Holotescu, C. (2008). Can we use Twitter for educational activities?. Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific Conference. eLSE.

Hartshorne, J. K., & Snedeker, J. (2013). Verb argument structure predicts implicit causality: The advantages of finer-grained semantics. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(10), 1474-1508.

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Routledge.

Jackson, R. (2013). Rethinking Educational Research. Routledge.

Jindal-Snape, D., & Snape, J. B. (2016). E-assessment: Past reflections and future possibilities. Routledge.

Koutsabasis, P., Vosinakis, S., & Malizia, A. (2012). Evaluating the usability of learning management systems: A literature review and an empirical study. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(3), 217-231.

Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066-1080.

Matz, S. C., Kosinski, M., Nave, G., & Stillwell, D. J. (2017). Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), 12714-12719.

Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2).

Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., ... & Kafai, Y. B. (2009). Scratch: programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67.

Schroeder, J., & Axelsson, A. S. (2013). Avatars and social interaction in virtual worlds: A review of the research. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 6(1).

Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 268-286.

Tressler, J. (2011). Design and implementation of a Facebook integrated university portal: Case study. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 7(2), 45-60.

Thompson, P., & Cook, D. (2016). Chatbots as conversational agents: How to make a computer 'chat'. Ergonomics, 59(2), 1-18.




How to Cite

Trilaksana, H. ., Soelistiono, S. ., & Wahidin. (2024). Campus Learning Based on AI: Implementation of ChatGPT in AILS and Its Implications for Curriculum Development in Indonesia. INFLUENCE: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE REVIEW, 6(1), 63–72.