The Role of CSR in Enhancing ESG Impact: Case Study of The Pengembangan Petani Madu Sari Alam Semberah (TAMU SARAH) Program

Luthfi Kurniawan  Joshi; Reza Bagus  Yustriawan

Authors

Luthfi Kurniawan Joshi Jr. Officer Comrel & CID Zona 9, Indonesia
Reza Bagus Yustriawan Community Development Officer PT Pertamina EP Sangatta-Semberah Field, Indonesia

Keywords:

CSR, ESG, Pengembangan Petani Madu Sari Alam Semberah (TAMU SARAH) Program.

Abstract

In the last decade, the principles of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) have become not just a trend but a business paradigm for companies. This aligns with the increasing praxis of the ‘S’ or social aspect in ESG, which companies implement through CSR programs. This study, employing a qualitative approach through a single case study type, specifically highlights the Pengembangan Petani Madu Sari Alam Semberah (TAMU SARAH) CSR Program conducted by PT Pertamina EP Sangatta-Semberah Field. The findings of this study indicate that the CSR program praxis is relevant to the company’s ESG principles, which can be measured through, first, community engagement in community development praxis. This praxis has strengthened the relationship between the company and the local community. The second is local content. Through the CSR program, the company not only creates group satisfaction with the ongoing program but also tends to contribute to the pleasure and happiness of group members. The last one is the indirect economic impact. Through ECON-ESG measurements, it was found that the Pengembangan Petani Madu Sari Alam Semberah (TAMU SARAH) CSR program does not lead to a decrease in GDP; on the contrary, it positively contributes to macroeconomic conditions.

References

Peiró-Signes, A. & Segarra-Oña, M. V. Trends in ESG practices: Differences and similarities across major developed markets. Sustain. Apprais. Quant. methods Math. Tech. Environ. Perform. Eval. 125–140 (2013).

Serikakhmetova, A. B. & Adambekova, A. A. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Context of ESG: Development and Current Trends. Farabi J. Soc. Sci. 8, 24–32 (2022).

Que, S., Wang, L., Awuah-Offei, K., Yang, W. & Jiang, H. Corporate social responsibility: Understanding the mining stakeholder with a case study. Sustainability 11, 2407 (2019).

Yin, R. K. Case study research: design and methods. United States: Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data vol. 2 (United States: Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, 2009).

Hollweck, T. Robert K. Yin. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods. Can. J. Progr. Eval. 30, 108–110 (2015).

Fadiah, L. H. Peran Lebah Madu Klanceng (trigona sp) Dalam Mendukung Kesejahteraan Manusia Dan Lingkungan. J. Ris. Rumpun Ilmu Hewani 2, 44–55 (2023).

Febriani, E. & Pujiastuti, Y. The stingless bee species Trigona spp. on various species of flowering plants in Baturaja City, Ogan Komering Ulu District, South Sumatra. J. Smart Agric. Environ. Technol. 1, 7–13 (2023).

Ramdiawan, R., Herdiana, H. & Rosadi, N. A. Contribution of Trigona Honey Bee Business (Trigona sp) to Farmers’ Income in Bengkaung Village, West Lombok Regency. Kompartemen Kumpul. Orientasi Pasar Konsum. 1, 72–77 (2023).

Shakotko, C. ESG Programs: Understanding the Untapped Opportunities. Chem. Eng. 130, (2023).

Mandell, M. Placing an Emphasis on the ‘S’in ESG. Dismantling Walls 24 (2022).

Pollman, E. The making and meaning of ESG. U Penn, Inst Law Econ Res. Pap. (2022).

Huang, C.-C., Chan, Y.-K. & Hsieh, M. Y. The determinants of ESG for community LOHASism sustainable development strategy. Sustainability 14, 11429 (2022).

Mitra, R., Cloutier, S., Nautiyal, S., Paralkar, S. & Morrison, B. A. Toward an applied assessment framework for neighborhood-level sustainability and happiness. Int. J. Sustain. Econ. Soc. Cult. Context 15, 25 (2019).

Barameechai, J. The green and happiness index. in International conference on happiness and public policy, Bangkok 18–19 (2007).

Denis Grigorevich, P. ESG-Factors of Direct and Indirect Impact on Public and Corporate Finance. Available SSRN 4553472 (2023).

Zhou, X., Caldecott, B., Harnett, E. & Schumacher, K. The effect of firm-level ESG practices on macroeconomic performance. Univ. Oxford Work. Pap. No. 20-03 (2020).

Işık, C., Ongan, S. & Islam, H. A new pathway to sustainability: Integrating economic dimension (ECON) into ESG factors as (ECON-ESG) and aligned with sustainable development goals (SDGs). J. Ekon. 6, 34–39 (2024).

The United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. What Is ESG Integration? Available online: https://www.unpri.org/investor-tools/what-is-esg-integration/3052.article

Hale, J.; Legun, K.; Campbell, H.; Carolan, M. Social sustainability indicators as performance. Geoforum 2019, 103, 47–55.

A. B. Carroll, & A. K. Buchholtz, Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Nelson Education. (2014).

Serikakhmetova, Z., & Adambekova, A. (2022). ESG Disclosure and Financial Performance: Evidence from Emerging Markets.

Edwards, M., & Richardson, T. (2022). CSR, Community Development, and Social Capital: Exploring the Theoretical Linkages and Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(2), 353-371.

Hernandez, M., & Diaz, P. (2022). Integrating Community Development into Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies: Insights from Leading Companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(4).

Mohammed, A., & Agyemang, G. (2023). The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Community Development: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry. Journal of Business Research, 156.

Tripopsakul, S. & Puriwat, W. Understanding the impact of ESG on brand trust and customer engagement. J. Human, Earth, Futur. 3, 430–440 (2022).

Pelosi, N. & Adamson, R. Managing the “S” in ESG: The case of indigenous peoples and extractive industries. J. Appl. Corp. Finance. 28, 87–95 (2016).